News 
 National News 
 National 
 General 
 Poll has Abbott reeling 

Poll has Abbott reeling

18 Aug, 2010 04:00 AM
Labor is clinging to a four-seat majority just three days from the federal election, according to 28,000 voters sampled in the most comprehensive public opinion poll undertaken in Australian politics.

The JWS Research poll, which has been obtained exclusively by Fairfax Media, shows that if the election were held last weekend, Labor would have lost 15 seats and gained six, handing it a net loss of nine seats.

Labor notionally holds 88 seats, meaning it would have been reduced to 79, a majority of four in the 150-seat Parliament. The Coalition would have 68 seats and there would be three independents.

The poll shows Labor losses looming in Queensland, NSW and Western Australia but it stands to gain in Victoria, regional NSW and South Australia.

The poll was conducted on Saturday and Sunday and is the biggest and the most specific of its kind.

Using automated phone calls, it sampled 22,000 voters in the 54 most marginal seats in the country. In each seat, 400 voters were canvassed.

The 54 seats included Labor's 33 most marginal seats, starting from the notionally held and most marginal, Macarthur, with a margin of 0.2 per cent, up to and including Lindsay, which Labor holds by 6.4 per cent.

The 21 Coalition seats polled started from the most marginal, Bowman, with a 0.1 per cent margin, up to and including McMillan with a 4.8 per cent margin.

Another 6000 voters from safe seats were surveyed.

The results showed that if the election were held last weekend, Labor would have lost four seats in NSW - Lindsay, Bennelong, Macarthur and Robertson but would have held on to Eden-Monaro and Dobell.

It would have lost eight seats in Queensland - Brisbane, Bonner, Petrie, Leichhardt, Forde, Dawson, Flynn and Dickson. It would have lost Corangamite in Victoria, and in Western Australia, Hasluck and Swan.

The 15 losses would have been offset by gaining Paterson and Cowper in NSW, McEwen, La Trobe and Dunkley in Victoria, and Boothby in South Australia.

''This call obviously precedes events in the last week of campaigning that might influence this outcome either way. Local incumbency and candidate name identity also plays a role,'' the managing director of JWS, John Scales, said.

Mr Scales, a renowned pollster, spent three years at Roy Morgan Research before becoming director of the Morgan Poll from 1992 to 1995. From 2002 until this year, he was the research director at Crosby Textor.

Each election, more people tend to vote before polling day and Labor fears that its bad second week of the campaign cost it prepoll votes. Mr Scales's research found that of the 28,000 people sampled, 4576 - or 15 per cent - had already voted but they favoured Labor on a two-party-preferred basis by 56.5 per cent to 43.5 per cent.

In the 54 seats, the Labor-Coalition split was 53.2 per cent to 46.8 per cent among those who have voted.

Labor's total primary vote in the 54 marginals is a lowly 35 per cent, the Coalition's 44.7 per cent and the Greens 14.3 per cent. Labor trails on the two-party vote by 49.2 to 50.8.

Among all 28,000 voters Labor leads by 51.6% to 48.4%.

The seat-by-seat findings show Bennelong, which Labor's Maxine McKew took from John Howard in 2007, falling to the Coalition. It comes as the betting odds in the seat closed after a flurry of bets on the Liberal candidate, John Alexander.

The poll shows Labor trailing in Bennelong by 47.5 per cent to 52.5 per cent, a 4 percentage point swing against Ms McKew. In Lindsay, the poll picks up an 8.2 point swing against Labor.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Don't believe it -another last ditch effort by a desperate government and biased media to make this incompetent, wasteful and big promising but no delivery government look like the winner. But we will all be losers if Gillard gets in on Saturday. Vote for the future of Australia - Vote 1 the Liberals.
Posted by Told you so....., 18/08/2010 11:01:06 AM
Wait, so we shouldn't believe it, even though you admit it might happen?
Posted by Alex, 18/08/2010 2:34:09 PM
Don't spoil the party down there fellow Southerners. We are all busting to see Julia sqirming on the opposition benches alongside her very badly treated former boss Kevin Rudd after Saturday night.
Posted by kev the australian, 18/08/2010 4:20:07 PM
Lovely to see the green vote is getting higher, sensible people!
Posted by Annika, 18/08/2010 7:07:18 PM
I am sure that poll has Abbott reeling,he is up against two parties,Labor and the greens.who are heavily funded by the unions,trying to achieve something that has not happened in Australia since 1931. Who writes the headlines? I suspect Abbott will be reeling if he wins.
Posted by Noelene Nicholas, 18/08/2010 8:14:56 PM
Well if they get in again the Liberals should just refuse to fix there mess like they have done countless times through our history. Let all these dopes that vote labor pay 57cents in the dollar in taxes to pay the debt back.
Posted by I'm nobody's puppet, 18/08/2010 10:24:44 PM
Ask yourself this, If your boss came to you and said he will pay you an extra $100,000 a year if you spend $5,000 of your own money on some sort of training, would you do it? Well what if he said the same thing but you had to donate $40,000 of your extra $100,000 to pay for roads, schools and hospitals, would you still do it? Now imagine the your a mining company and instead of talking 100's of thousands we are talking 100's of millions. Do you really think the mining companies are going to walk away from all that money just because they have to share it with the rest of us? Why do you think they campaigned so hard against it, because they know if it comes to be, they won't take there business elsewhere, they won't shut up shop, they will stay and they will pay.
Posted by JS, 19/08/2010 5:25:25 AM
Who saved the country from recession with the recession buster payments and who didn't want them to do it? What sort of state would we be in now if the current opposition had been in power and had done nothing as they wanted to do? Who abolished workchoices?
Posted by JS, 19/08/2010 5:30:07 AM
It could be nice to see Julia squirm briefly kev, but think of the three years of 'back to the Howard days' we would have to suffer as a result. I'm genuinely still undecided, and what a lousy decision to have to make between two colourless 'leaders'.
Posted by Undecided, 19/08/2010 10:52:30 AM

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.

Most popular articles




Hume Weekly







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...